Published in the Journal of
Corporate
Real Estate, Vol. 7 No. 3, 2005
|
||||
|
Rapid
innovation can be essential to an organization’s survival in today’s
hypercompetitive business environment. A
new breed of worker is emerging to provide the required creativity. These highly sophisticated workers will demand
an environment that attracts them, satisfies their needs, and provides
an
incentive to stay. With the projected
shortfall of skilled workers in the Research
on the impact of technology on work patterns and the work environment
that I
conducted with a major corporate research laboratory led to some
relevant
insights. Leading-edge firms around the
globe were identified, their senior management teams interviewed and
work
patterns observed. This data was
analyzed systemically to understand the dynamics in play.
These companies were found to be creating
competitive advantage by aligning their strategic intent with their
policies
and the tools, resources and environments they were providing their
employees. The
work environments that companies have provided for the past
half-century are
increasingly unsuited to emerging patterns of work and are inhibiting
workers
from performing to their full potential. An
effective workplace solution allows a natural and
efficient
sharing
of knowledge [figure 1]. Increased
knowledge sharing leads to enhanced productivity, improved quality, and
accelerated
innovation. What it is
The
typical office environment has not changed much in forty years. Landscape partitioning, introduced in the
early 1960’s, has become infamous as the “Dilbert cube.”
As anyone who has worked in a sea of cubicles
can attest, it is nearly impossible to have the speech privacy required
for
some conversations or to concentrate on focused reading, thinking or
analysis. Enclosed offices, on the other
hand, inhibit
spontaneous communication. The trend in corporate offices today is to
have fewer and
smaller individual workspaces and a greater portion of the space
dedicated to
interactive uses in an array of functions and sizes.
The
main function of the workplace is shifting toward intense interaction. Space is being optimized for all types of
collaboration, ranging from large formal meetings to chance
interactions as two
people pass in the corridor. For quick
transitions from one mode of working (collaborative) to another
(heads-down),
“thinking spaces” are needed for periods of concentration.
A corporate facility must provide the right
mix of these spaces and also support virtual interaction with globally
dispersed teams of colleagues, partners and customers.
Stone and Luchetti[i]
suggested twenty years ago that the corporate office should provide a
variety
of “activity settings” to meet a range of needs, with workers moving to
the
most appropriate space throughout the day. Some
organizations assign a “home base” to workers who are
often
in the
office. Other firms opt to make
workspaces available on an as-needed basis, provide shared spaces or
use a
combination of these approaches. Many
people are already working remotely for at least part of the week, and
their
number is steadily increasing. Workplace
strategies are now catching up with reality to better manage and
support these
mobile work processes. Accessible
broadband,
voice over IP (VoIP), wireless voice and data on handheld devices, and
other
new technologies will continue to reduce perceived distances between
dispersed
workers. Better interfaces, more
reliability and lower costs will further reinforce the trend toward
remote
work. The
home office is now seen as a viable alternative to commuting to a
corporate
facility. However, there are factors
that can make the home a less-than-ideal work environment.
These include interruptions, distractions,
loneliness, technology support issues and lack of suitable space. Road warriors and free agents often opt
to
work in coffee shops, libraries and other public places.
Client sites, airport lounges, and hotel
facilities also serve as remote work locations. Satellite
facilities (also known as “third places”), where space and services are
available
on a flexible basis, are sprouting up to serve both free agents and
corporate
employees. These facilities can offer a
place to work, to meet with clients, to make use of support services,
to have
access to advanced systems, and to make new contacts.
Services range from simply being the address
for mail delivery to providing space to incubate a business. Satellites are usually small facilities
located within an easy commuting distance of their user base. Those operated
for a single corporation can provide employees who reside in an area
remote
from a main facility with an alternative to commuting long distances or
working
from home. The corporation benefits by shrinking the number of
workspaces in
main offices. These
are examples of how the work environment is being transformed. The workplace will continue to change as
business needs drive new solutions and emerging technologies enable
them to
become reality.
Figure 1:
Why you should care An
ability to embrace continuous change and respond rapidly with
innovative
products and solutions is vitally important in an increasingly dynamic
business
environment. Organizations that ignore the
changes in work patterns, workforce and work environment are likely to
find
themselves at a considerable disadvantage from which it will be
difficult, if
not impossible, to recover.
Work
patterns are changing In
response to this demand for rapid innovation, work has become more
flexible,
distributed and collaborative. Remember
the elusive promise of more leisure time thanks to technology
innovations? That was obliterated when
companies
“reengineered” and “right-sized,” causing surviving employees to face
ever-increasing demands for productivity. Although
this productivity increase was meant to come from
continuous
process improvement, workweeks of sixty hours or more became common. Job requirements, enabled by advances in
communication, have blurred the distinction between work and personal
time. Specific hours, location, and
dress codes are rapidly becoming obsolete. Anytime/anywhere
has become the norm. Management
styles have become less hierarchical, job security has become an
historic
artifact, and work is organized around collaborative teams, often
geographically dispersed. The
The
workforce is changing Companies
are shopping globally for high-quality services at the lowest price by
off-shoring, near-shoring and seeking low-cost domestic labor markets. Nearly instantaneous, low-cost
communication has enabled the globalization of work.
Profound
shifts in the domestic workforce are also inevitable based on current
demographic trends. The Baby Boom
generation is nearing retirement age and there are not enough workers
in the
25-44 age range to replace them. For
example, even though companies will continue to seek low-cost labor
markets
globally, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a shortfall of
10
million workers in the Employers
are beginning to appreciate the wisdom of keeping critically important
skills,
knowledge, relationships and experience from walking out the door. They are considering flexible retirement
options that allow mature workers to continue on their own terms, with
much
more control over their schedule and location. In a Harvard Business
Review
article called “It’s Time to Retire Retirement,” Ken Dychtwald says,
“The
concept of retirement is outdated and should be put out to pasture in
favor of
a more flexible approach to ongoing work.”[iii] People are living longer, healthier
lives. Motivated both by a desire to
work and by economic necessity, many older workers are eager to take
advantage
of these options. As
a result, many more generations will be in the work force
simultaneously.
Younger workers’ priorities include creating a balance between work and
personal time. Their expectations of
their employers extend beyond salary to issues such as flexible hours,
amenities (day-care, fitness centers, food service, etc.), the latest
technology tools and the quality of the work environment.
They tend to choose companies with values
that are closely aligned to their own. The
number of women and minorities will better reflect the population. Women, already constituting nearly 50% of the
workforce, will be better represented across levels and functions. Gender, cultural and racial workforce
diversity offers employers competitive advantage in many ways. For example, as the workforce begins to
mirror their customers, companies are better able to anticipate and
meet
customer needs. Diversity also brings
multiple, overlapping and, possibly, conflicting values, traditions,
needs and
desires into the workplace. Careful
attention must be paid to meet these needs. The
relationship between employees and their employers has shifted as
loyalty and
lifetime employment have become artifacts of the past.
Workers are becoming entrepreneurial, relying
more on their own abilities than on entitlements. Individuals are
taking
responsibility for developing and maintaining their skills. “Free agents” will account for a greater
proportion of the workforce. Their
marketability is directly tied to the benefits they deliver to their
employers. Competition
for key talent will be stiff. Employers
will be constantly challenged to attract and maintain a staff with the
skills
that are critical to the organization’s success. Highly
talented individuals will wield a good
deal of discretionary power. Richard
Florida, professor at Carnegie Mellon, author and theorist, labels this
type of
worker “the creative class”. Speaking
as one of them, he writes “In addition to
being fairly compensated for the work we do and the skills we bring, we
want
the ability to learn and grow, shape the content of work, control our
own
schedules and express our identities through work.
And companies of all types, including large
established ones, are adapting to this change by striving to create new
workplaces that are more amenable to creative work.
In this, they have no choice: Either
they will create these kinds of
environments or they will wither and die.”[iv]
While
changes in work patterns and the workforce are occurring rapidly,
changes in
the workplace are taking place at a much slower pace.
Investments in buildings, furniture and
equipment remain on the books for long, fixed periods.
As a result, work environments are likely to
reflect outdated work patterns. Because
many companies are still trying to shed excess space due to corporate
mergers
and staff downsizing, they may have little appetite to embark on new
initiatives even if the investment would lower operating costs. As we have seen, competitive pressures and
the impending labor shortage will require that companies adapt their
work
arrangements to support workers, to help them connect and to build a
sense of
community. Flexible work environments:
The
work environment must be responsive to multifaceted requirements. This does not mean that the workplace will be
tailored to individuals or processes, since they are continually
changing. While work tasks may be more
specialized than
ever before, tools are becoming more generic. The
architect’s drafting table, the scientist’s lab and
the
researcher’s
library are no longer specialized spaces or hardware – just software
and access
to information. A
corporate reorganization no longer foreshadows a series of staged moves
and
costly refits. With phone number
portability, the ability to log on to any device and flexible
furniture, this
becomes a matter of moving boxes at most. The need for mobility has provided
the incentive to reduce extra baggage, print
less and have fewer personal items on hand, thus challenging
long-standing
assumptions about storage needs. Teams
need the ability to form and disband quickly and easily in response to
project
requirements. The key is flexibility,
accomplished by providing a variety of spaces (quiet space, meeting
rooms,
gathering places, etc.), adaptable furniture configurations and
technology
tools to link geographically dispersed team members.
Distributed work environments: Mobility
has already happened even without formal policies.
Whether someone is in the office, on the road
or working from home has become largely irrelevant.
Non-traditional
workplaces include home offices, airports, workplace clubs, satellite
offices,
libraries, coffee shops and any wireless hot-spot.
Historic sites and rural locations
that could not function effectively when everything needed to be
hardwired are
now finding new uses. Wireless voice and
data are making workers increasingly independent of a fixed location,
even
within the corporate office. Off-shoring and near-shoring trends will continue and accelerate. Employers are actively seeking ways to best manage and support all remote workers in order to make the most of the potential productivity gains and cost savings. McKinsey & Company’s TomorrowLab co-founders, George Goldsmith and Cory Lefebvre, found four factors that lead to an efficient and effective virtual team: a shared vision and process, great people, effective communication and appropriate technology.[v] By providing remote workers with the tools and infrastructure they need, perceived distances are reduced. Collaborative work environments: More
collaboration, both face-to-face and virtual, is
required than ever before. Collaboration
is critical to innovation (many minds
working toward creative solutions), efficiency (enhanced
decision-making) and
quality (more knowledge-sharing, leading to better results). What will draw employees to the office are
amenities such as
fitness centers, food and collegiality. Physical proximity has the benefit of
informal and
serendipitous information sharing. A
distributed team must create norms for interaction and should get
together at
regular intervals to reinforce personal connections.
Even though most
knowledge work can now be accomplished remotely using
increasingly
sophisticated tools, trust must be established and periodically
maintained with
face-to-face interaction. Seven Myths
of
Workplace Strategy No
longer “the workplace of the future” or “alternative officing.”
innovative
workplace solutions are becoming critical to organizational success.
The future
is here (in places) and alternative approaches are becoming mainstream. Through trial and error, best practices have
emerged. However, some of the more
widely publicized failures may have left executives wary of trying any
of these
approaches. To them, Workplace
Strategy
might mean…. …it’s
going to cost a lot. Creating
physical and virtual environments that support new patterns of work
does not
have to be costly. Look around the typical workplace on any given day. A high percentage of offices and work areas
are not being used. Corporations are finding that the office
environment is
used at 30% to 50% of its capacity at any particular time.
Assigned workspaces are often unoccupied as
employees become increasingly mobile. This
inefficiency points to a tremendous potential for
cost
savings. Myth 2 …we’ll
have to start from scratch. Since
the environment consists of social, physical and technical components,
simple
changes can make a big difference. For
example, relaxing rigid workplace policies and norms, increasing
air-quality
control or introducing new technology can have a positive effect. …hoteling
(also known as moteling, free-address, hot desking or
unassigned) i. Workplace
strategy does not have to include mobility, unassigned workareas, or
any
specific element. It is important that the strategy adopted be
designed
to meet the particular needs of an organization. It
may exclude distance collaboration
altogether. …more
employees will be packed into less space. Corporations
can choose to have a workplace strategy of offices for every employee
(like
Microsoft) or no private offices for anyone. They might provide
specific
functions, such as software engineers, with dedicated offices and team
space
(like SunMicrosystems). With the
emphasis on collaborative space, employees have the ability to move
from place
to place throughout the workday, choosing the most appropriate space
for their
current activity. …employees
will be forced to work differently. A
workplace strategy might mean planning to better support current
patterns of
work while capturing potential savings by improving space utilization. …there
will be less face-to-face interaction. In
a traditional office, the person you need to see is not very likely to
be
sitting in the office awaiting your arrival. Since
gatherings of mobile workers are planned at regular
intervals,
there may actually be more face time. …the
corporate office will become extinct. The
main function of the corporate office will shift from individual to
interactive
space. Taken to
the
extreme, some organizations may choose to go “virtual” and hold
gatherings in
non-corporate venues. Implementing
Workplace
Solutions Corporate
Real Estate often finds itself in the position of introducing these
concepts
within their organizations. This is
fine. However, to be successful, the
implementation of a workplace solution must ultimately be championed by
the CEO
and the rest of the C-suite. Active
partnership with human resources and information technology staff is
critical. Equally important is
establishing the trust, involvement and ownership of those affected by
the
change. As a major shift from their
traditional roles, CRE executives may find themselves in the position
of
raising critical issues to the C-suite level to obtain support,
orchestrating a
cross-functional team, and leading change management efforts. The
basis of any workplace solution is an understanding of current business
processes (obtained through interviews, surveys and observation)
combined with
deep knowledge of industry trends and best practices.
Traditional methods of programming relied on
quantitative measures such as linear feet of shelving and square feet
of work
surface, which derived from historic work patterns.
Workplace solutions must take into account
such diverse qualitative variables as business drivers, employee
demographics, brand
image, and desirable patterns of work. An
effective workplace strategy must simultaneously address the social,
physical,
and technical components of the work environment as well as financial
considerations, since each factor impacts the others.
Social (culture,
human networks, communities of practice,
policies,
behaviors, norms
and organizational structure): The
workplace should support and enable work activities that meet business
goals. At a minimum, it should not
create obstacles, inhibit productivity or attempt to force change in
ways that
may have unforeseen results. The
environment and the integrated use of technology can reduce barriers to
communication, create opportunities for casual encounters and help
build
community. While the workplace alone
cannot transform work cultures and behaviors, it is a powerful tool for
supporting desired changes and can serve as a symbol of organizational
values
to employees and customers. Workplace
innovation sends a powerful message of the intent for transformational
change. This message must be
synchronized with internal and external communications, management
behavior and
performance measures. Mixed messages
are a recipe for failure. Physical (place
and space): Considerations of the physical work
environment must include
geography, climate, political boundaries, urban vs. suburban vs. rural,
architectural configuration (campus, tower, etc.), amenities (such as
daycare,
fitness, cafeteria), and workarea configuration, furniture, fixtures,
finishes
and environmental quality (heat, light and air).
These factors can have a tremendous impact
on performance – how we think, act and feel.
Within the work area, noise has consistently been
identified in
employee
surveys as a primary inhibiting factor in workplace effectiveness. Surprisingly, too little noise can be as
distracting as too much; any isolated sound becomes intrusive. A background “buzz” of activity can
actually
improve performance. On the trading
floors of large financial institutions, professional workers are
intentionally
located in close proximity in order to create a hub of intense activity
and
make the spontaneous sharing of information possible.
Technical
(tools and infrastructure): Workplace technology enables
flexibility, remote
work and collaboration. Mobility both
within
the office and externally is becoming seamless for both voice, image
and
data. As technology becomes more
intuitive, ubiquitous and cost-effective, acceptance and use
proliferate.
Financial
(revenue and expense): Benefits accrue
both through improved revenues and reduced costs. Workplace
optimization enhances profitability
by leading to increased quality, productivity, and innovation. Costs savings are achieved by reducing
recruiting, training and lost productivity while new employees are
found and
brought up to speed. Costs are also
saved through more efficient use of space. For
example, it is estimated that each virtual worker
without an
assigned seat in a corporate facility reduces occupancy expense by
$6,000 to
$7,500 annually. Increased spending on
information technology is offset by reduced real estate requirements
and
facility costs. It helps tremendously if
the CRE and IT budgets are considered as a single entity so that the
initial
financial impacts of the initiative can be properly evaluated. These
components traditionally fall within discrete departments of an
organization. Social considerations are
largely the domain of human resources. The physical environment comes
under the
real estate and facilities department, while the technical belongs to
the IT
department. Because no single function
owns all the components, implementing an effective workplace initiative
may
require a shift in traditional processes, relationships and work habits. While these functions will most likely remain
autonomous, it is important that their goals and metrics are aligned in
order
to achieve optimal results. This
alignment is best achieved by involving all parties early as equal team
members, valuing their perspectives and working together toward
solutions. The
successful implementation of a workplace strategy requires an
interdisciplinary
team, internal and external to the organization. Senior
executives and business line managers provide critical
leadership. Without
their commitment, any workplace initiative is highly unlikely to
succeed. Employees who
are directly affected hold key knowledge of social networks and
know how work
is actually accomplished. They will feel
more ownership in the outcome when they are involved in the process. Human resource
professionals monitor and assess the behavioral impact of any
workplace
intervention, and provide training and coaching for management and
staff
before, during and after the transition. They
may need to engage external expertise if change
management
capability does not reside in-house Corporate
communications staff orchestrates the communication strategy. Information
technology people introduce solutions based on suitability and
cost-effectiveness.
Real estate,
project management and facility personnel gather business
requirements, monitor
best practices, introduce innovative solutions and manage
implementation. Strategic
partners (architects, facility managers, etc) provide an
external perspective
and professional expertise. Bringing them into the process in the early
stages
ensures that the full intent of the initiative is well understood. A workplace
consultant may be retained to engage the team, help define
success
criteria, manage the process, and assess results. Through
the active participation of all
stakeholders, the resulting solution will be more robust, more readily
embraced
and more successful. Pilot
projects are a great way for a company to begin testing some of these
concepts
as they apply to their own situation. Identifying
an operating unit that is a willing
participant is
best. If this is not achievable, using
CRE or another function as the test organization will get you going. By approaching initial efforts as
“pilots,”
risk is limited. There is an implicit permission to experiment with
innovative
solutions and approaches to their implementation. Successful
pilots will create a “buzz” of
excitement within the organization. CRE organizations may find
themselves in
the position of being inundated with requests for similar projects
while they
are still in the post-occupancy evaluation stage. Pre-
and post-occupancy evaluations should be carefully designed and well
executed
to determine if program objectives have been met. The
measurements of a workplace initiative
should be both qualitative and quantitative, with a “balanced
scorecard”
approach[vi] that
gives
weight to dimensions such as the organization’s and employees’ ability
to learn
and grow, customer satisfaction, business process improvements and
financial
management. In this way, the business
case can be made for investing in the workplace that informs further
initiatives. Stories of
Workplace
Solutions across Industries The
following are some snapshots of companies from a variety of industries
that
have successfully implemented workplace solutions.
Each situation is unique and, even within the
same industry, solutions will vary tremendously. Financial
Services FleetBoston
Financial (now part of Bank of America) was able to take advantage of a
lease
expiration to move its software programmers out of an urban tower in a
crime-ridden neighborhood with limited nighttime access.
They moved the group to a suburban location
with safe 24/7 access at a lower occupancy rate. To
improve collaboration among the programmers,
several team rooms and two coffee bars were located within the office
area. Individual workstations were
smaller than those vacated, but they were more enclosed and had more
storage
space and better acoustic properties. At
the same time, the programmers were equipped to work remotely. This not only improved their emergency
response time but also enabled the new facility to double as a disaster
recovery site. Technology Hewlett
Packard is targeting a metric of 50
gross square feet per employee in their Sales and Service offices, down
from
150 today. It does not plan to
accomplish this by drastically reducing the size of workspaces but by
better
supporting employees working remotely, recapturing underutilized
workspaces,
and providing more collaborative spaces. Achieving
this metric is a gradual process. HP
recognizes that a significant amount of
remote work is already happening. The
new design and management of the workplace gives these mobile employees
“permission” to be away from their desk. As
a result, individual work space is less in demand.
This allows another pass at reducing the
number of workspaces provided in a facility. To
avoid the possibility of an employee not being able to
find a
place
to work when he or she comes into the office, actual utilization of
seats is
targeted at 70% - a moving target as more employees become mobile. HP finds that the use of free-address
workspaces drives efficiency gains. However,
the company warns against formal policies for
home-based
working; both employees and employer are wary of them.
HP is also aware that face-to-face
interaction is critical and periodically creates events to ensure that
it
happens. Biotechnology Henri
Termeer, Chairman, President and CEO of Genzyme Corporation in Consulting
and Accounting PricewaterhouseCoopers
consolidated their Midtown Manhattan practice last summer from two
offices into
a new location on Madison Avenue. While maintaining headcount, PwC was
able to
reduce square footage by 20%. The
new
facility is a showcase for an office design concept that PwC calls
Global
Workplace. Already in use in 25 cities across the Government
Scottish
Enterprises, the agency responsible for the economic development of
lowland Conclusion We are at a tipping point where these
innovative
concepts will become basic requirements. Workplace
strategy is a triple win. Organizations
like it because it enhances their ability to
hire
and
retain key employees, increases productivity and saves money. Employees find it easier to collaborate and
to balance work/life issues. The natural environment is also a winner
as
commuting requirements are reduced, and mobility becomes a key driver
of the
elusive “paperless office.” In the past several years, many companies
have shrunk their
real estate portfolios to keep pace with declining headcount. Now, as the global economy shows signs of
recovery, companies are starting to see revenue growth.
However, the number of new jobs created may be
less than we have experienced historically due to increased
productivity and
outsourcing. Square footage requirements
will grow even more slowly, if at all, as the trend continues toward
mobile
work. The role of corporate real estate
needs to shift. CRE executives must
become leaders in the integration of space, technology, policies and
practices. They will need to consider
the social and behavioral aspects of the workforce, current and optimal
patterns of work and creative workplace solutions in order to create
sustainable competitive advantage. Done
well, this cross-disciplinary leadership role could become a critical
success
factor to an organization.
[i]
Phillip J. Stone and Robert Luchetti, Your office is
where you are, Harvard Business Review, March-April 1985, Volume 63,
Number 2,
Page 102 [ii] Gary Hamel, Leading the Revolution:
How to Thrive in Turbulent Times by Making Innovation
[iii]
Ken Dychtwald, Tamara Erickson and Bob Morrison,
“It’s Time to Retire Retirement” Harvard Business Review, March 2004,
Volume
82, Number 3, Page 48. [iv]
The Rise of the Creative Class and how its
transforming work, leisure,
community and
everyday life, Richard Florida, Basic Books, 2002 [v]
Managing
Virtual Teams (Interactive CD-ROM) Apr 3,
2002, Linda A. Hill
, Harvard Business Press [vi] The Balanced
Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Robert S.
Kaplan and David P.
Norton, [vii] Building Consensus, Fast Talk: Better by Design, It can be a catalyst, a transformative force. Five corporate leaders who "get" design talk about how it has influenced their companies' strategies. Christine Canabou, Fast Company, Issue 83, June 2004, Page 51 [viii]
Commercial Real Estate; A New Office Can Mean Making
Do With Less, Terry Pristin, New York
Times, May 26, 2004 [ix] Working
without walls: An insight into the
transforming government workplace, DEGW / Office of Government
Commerce, Crown
copyright 2004 |
||||
|